I'm in the market for a new vacuum cleaner & I've heard good things about Shark.
Looking around, I've seen the iz300uk is currently available for £250 (Currys or Argos) and was wondering if its a good choice for the money (my budget is £250 > £300)
I've always considered getting a Dyson but I've hear far too many people complain about them - especially when it comes to faults. Plus they are a lot more expensive.
My house is 50% hard floor & 50% carpet. So the fact that you dont need to change the head to suit the floor type with the Shark is a real bonus. Addtionally, I have no pets.
So, if theres anyone out there thats using one of these, I would love to here your feedback.
Ta.
5 Comments
sorted byebay.co.uk/str…563
It is far too heavy to move around. Also I am only 5ft 4in and the length of the handle makes it unusable for me. You can’t shorten the height of it and therefore it makes it very awkward to use.
I am going to sell mine and go back to dyson. (edited)
Also the weight of the iZ300uk is a lot less than your version (4.5kg vs 7kg)
For me, Performance is more important than height or weight.
I hate it, wife hates it, kids hate it.
Horrible to manoeuvre, useless accessories included, need to purchase multiple extra heads and the filters are terrible.
We have a small Jack Russel wire hair and the anti tangle brush doesn't fill with hair...but the vacuum head clogs and then I have to take it apart to clean.
I would not buy a shark ever again. CS were useless when discussing with them shortly after purchase.
I previously had a Dyson cylinder vac to pull along and I would give anything to have it back. Perhaps those who love Shark (and I know they're many) haven't had the Dyson quality machine before and are over the moon it's better than the £100 models previously owned.