Groups

    Yearbook pic shows student in background w/ hand up girl's dress, could face charges

    Banned
    "Officials warned that those who did not return their yearbooks could face charges of possession of child pornography."

    Possession of child pornography, honestly?

    21 Comments

    Original Poster Banned

    latimesblogs.latimes.com/lan…tml
    Authorities investigating an alleged sex crime captured in the 2011 Big Bear High School yearbook said Tuesday their work is ongoing, but that charges eventually could be filed.

    The high school made headlines last week when a photograph depicting a 17-year-old male student with his hands inside the clothing of a 15-year-old female student at a school dance was published in the yearbook.

    Sgt. Jeremiah MacKay of the Big Bear sheriff’s station said Tuesday that although his investigation was not complete, it showed that sexual penetration of a minor had occurred.

    It would be up to the San Bernardino County district attorney’s office to file charges, MacKay said. The crime could be charged as either a felony or misdemeanor, MacKay said.

    The Press-Enterprise reported Monday that the two students appeared in the background of the photograph, which was taken at a winter formal, and the boy had his hand up the knee-length dress of the girl.

    MacKay could not confirm these details.

    Crimes involving the sexual penetration of a minor fall under child abuse statutes, MacKay said, and school and law enforcement officials are required to report and investigate such incidents.

    “As much as we know teenagers are and will be teenagers, by law we cannot ignore it,” MacKay said.

    School administrators notified sheriff’s deputies about the photograph, which was discovered after yearbooks were distributed nearly two weeks ago.

    The yearbooks were immediately recalled, and students were ordered to bring them back to the school so the page with the photograph could be removed.

    Officials warned that those who did not return their yearbooks could face charges of possession of child pornography.

    MacKay said that as of Tuesday, all but two of the yearbooks had been returned.

    The owners of the unreturned yearbooks had been contacted, he said, and had agreed to hand them in.

    Original Poster Banned

    if the kids can get charged with possession of child pornography then the school should be charged with publishing and distributing child pornography

    Banned

    All this effort and no pictures?

    Original Poster Banned

    JonnyTwoToes

    All this effort and no pictures?



    Your leaving this thread disappointed aren't you.

    Dare I post the link?

    PM ?

    people starving in the world, and they publish this drivel.

    I guess it has to be done. Recalling it I mean, not the charging people who do not return it, there may be those who are unaware ect but I doubt anyone would mind returning it if they are getting another one which is edited.

    Original Poster Banned

    bassman_uk

    Dare I post the link?PM ?



    You have the picture?

    DangerGod

    You have the picture?



    yep

    Original Poster Banned

    black gerbil1

    people starving in the world, and they publish this drivel.



    Your jeleous it wasn't your fingers,aren't you?

    link removed


    Original Poster Banned

    bassman_uk

    yep



    Oh. Well according to the article they are both fully clothed anyway. So post if you wish as I'm sure it's all been taken way out of proportion.

    DangerGod

    Oh. Well according to the article they are both fully clothed anyway. So … Oh. Well according to the article they are both fully clothed anyway. So post if you wish as I'm sure it's all been taken way out of proportion.



    True but still a bit risky for this site haha, even the smallest thing gets taken down, don't want bassman banned lol

    asayer

    True but still a bit risky for this site haha, even the smallest thing … True but still a bit risky for this site haha, even the smallest thing gets taken down, don't want bassman banned lol




    cheers dude. Will PM to those interested.

    asayer

    It was there, but gone now! lol



    I removed it to preserve my status. I'm sure there have been worse things up, but don't want to offend the Mods

    Original Poster Banned

    Lol ASB was ready to bash the bishop I'm sure..

    DangerGod

    Lol ASB was ready to bash the bishop I'm sure..



    I'm attempting to take the Hate out of the Love/Hate relationship i have with the Mods

    bassman_uk

    I'm attempting to take the Hate out of the Love/Hate relationship i have … I'm attempting to take the Hate out of the Love/Hate relationship i have with the Mods



    That will be hard haha! You know what this place is like!

    Banned

    DangerGod

    Lol ASB was ready to bash the bishop I'm sure..



    Weirdo.

    Original Poster Banned

    bykergrove

    looking at the general theme of your threads DG, I shudder to think what … looking at the general theme of your threads DG, I shudder to think what your browser history looks like



    its like gary glitters hard drive

    Banned

    DG - are you the Daily Mail?
    Post a comment
    Avatar
    @
      Text
      Top Discussions
      1. Does the app aznog still work?22
      2. Best Custom ROM for XIaomi Redmi Note 233
      3. Virgin Media TV67
      4. Samsung 4k TVs which one 49/55inch curved? £1.50023

      See more discussions