16 Comments

Original Poster

"Dear MinstrelMan,

You have received an infraction at HotUKDeals Forum.

Reason: Code Of Conduct Violation
-------
Oh thankyou VERY much - been waiting to watch that and you've just ruined it for anyone else who hasn't seen it
-------

This infraction is worth 1 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.

Original Post:
hotukdeals.com/for…912

:
no, he died in the last episode.

Maybe Arnie in that tosh film he did...... Eraser?
All the best,
HotUKDeals Forum"

Original Poster

Explain yourself please, the following post even joked that your beloved jack bauer didn't die. Your prcious keifer dies in Lost Boys though...... oh wait, banning offence?

Banned

Inb4 "Use contact Us as we wont discuss decisions in public".

Original Poster

its a valid question though, no?

they are making a 24 film so its fairly obvious jack doesnt die, chloe on the other hand lol

Regardless of the spoiler/non-spoiler, it is a pretty tasteless/off-topic post given the seriousness of that thread....

Banned

jah128;8745266

Regardless of the spoiler/non-spoiler, it is a pretty tasteless/off-topic … Regardless of the spoiler/non-spoiler, it is a pretty tasteless/off-topic post given the seriousness of that thread....



That wasn't what it was issued for and if it were, did they others receive similar treatment? You've clouded the issue which effectively raises further questions!

Banned

jah128;8745266

Regardless of the spoiler/non-spoiler, it is a pretty tasteless/off-topic … Regardless of the spoiler/non-spoiler, it is a pretty tasteless/off-topic post given the seriousness of that thread....



so infract him for that along with the others making jokes in the thread, not for putting a spoiler about a tv show thats already been aired.

I've never watched an episode of lost (and stayed away from threads mentioning what happened) so does this mean if someone mentions what happened in any episode from any series in a non lost thread I can report tham and they will get an infraction?

Totally out of order this one

Which part of the code of conduct did it breach?

colinsunderland;8745532

so infract him for that along with the others making jokes in the … so infract him for that along with the others making jokes in the thread...



Indeed; perhaps the reasons given in the infraction aren't the best, but that thread is in pretty bad taste to be honest. There are hundreds of thousands of people who will be pretty on edge and several families already devastated by events in Cumbria as we speak, some of the 'humour' in that thread is seriously misplaced...

Banned

jah128;8745559

Indeed; perhaps the reasons given in the infraction aren't the best, but that … Indeed; perhaps the reasons given in the infraction aren't the best, but that thread is in pretty bad taste to be honest. There are hundreds of thousands of people who will be pretty on edge and several families already devastated by events in Cumbria as we speak, some of the 'humour' in that thread is seriously misplaced...



thats correct but I'll bet others who were posting worse comments than him didn';t get infracted

does this mean that if anyone posts how this incident in whiteheaven finshes that they will be infracted for spoiling it for those who havn't watched the news?

Does this also apply to any other tv show that has been on air? are we now not allowed to discuss any tv programme just in case someone hasn't seen it. how far back does this apply? are we allowed to say who shot jr or more recently phil mitchell?

Does this apply to every sporting event ever? Again how far back are we allowed to go? can we discuss what happened in euro 96 or how tiger woods is doing?

Banned

ants97;8745604

does this mean that if anyone posts how this incident in whiteheaven … does this mean that if anyone posts how this incident in whiteheaven finshes that they will be infracted for spoiling it for those who havn't watched the news? Does this also apply to any other tv show that has been on air? are we now not allowed to discuss any tv programme just in case someone hasn't seen it. how far back does this apply? are we allowed to say who shot jr or more recently phil mitchell?Does this apply to every sporting event ever? Again how far back are we allowed to go? can we discuss what happened in euro 96 or how tiger woods is doing?



obviously, nothing can be discussed that has ever been shown on tv in case a certain moderator hasn't seen it

Original Poster

ants97;8745604

does this mean that if anyone posts how this incident in whiteheaven … does this mean that if anyone posts how this incident in whiteheaven finshes that they will be infracted for spoiling it for those who havn't watched the news? Does this also apply to any other tv show that has been on air? are we now not allowed to discuss any tv programme just in case someone hasn't seen it. how far back does this apply? are we allowed to say who shot jr or more recently phil mitchell?Does this apply to every sporting event ever? Again how far back are we allowed to go? can we discuss what happened in euro 96 or how tiger woods is doing?



We have levis 24 to ask about stuff like that, he's no doubt put a bet on. :w00t:

Original Poster

Thread closed Ceaser says "The infraction was for the spolier and your continued trolling in this thread"

:lol:

class, so he's admitted it was more for the spoiler, then realised theres potential backlash for such a rubbish reason so stuck trolling on there too.

oh look theres some goalposts...... oh wait, now they're over there!

I take it VB1 has been suspended :lol:

Banned

comedy Thread.

Inb4 Vb1 Said Worse.

Admin

Sorry MM but you were given a reason for the deletions in the previous thread. The OP was wanting to discuss the fact that there's a gunman picking people off near where he lives. I'm sure you already know I'm also from the Lake District, it's very busy up this way today, crowded with tourists and kids enjoying their halfterm break. The gunman is currently on foot having dumped his car near a large campsite at Boot, near Eskdale.
It is a serious issue, despite the hilarious comments from several members in the thread. It's a shame that a discussion like that still doesn't deter certain members from taking it off topic. It's not fair on Latinosharkey, the original OP. You guys are more than welcome to have your own little thread where you can make similar comments, but please be more considerate towards other members.

Sorry, commenting is no longer available on this feedback.