Canon EOS Deals & Offers

Just the one as far as I know :/

Thanks for your help, Phsy. Its my partner's birthday in a couple of months and a hint was dropped about a DSLR. I reckon this would be great as a first camera with 2 lenses and its in budget. Will sleep on it but reckon I will go ahead and buy, great price.

Hi cely. No, the price shown at the top is AFTER the discount code. When this "deal" first went live, the OP listed the full Ebay price. I then noticed they were running a promo code that you could also use, bringing the total to £360.05. Great price for this kit. Hope that helps. All the best, Phsy.

is that in addition to product5 discount or is just one coupon valid?

Cheers Toaster. I was under the impression that the 4000D was a better camera than my 1300D Which my non serious non photographer self is very happy with ;) I think that I will stay in my amateur photographer bliss (y)

terrible specs for a new dslr does seem to be old innards stuck in a shiny new case

In what possible way can a cheap plasicky entry level DSLR with an ancient sensor dating from 2009 (and a pair of genuinely sub-par kit lenses) be an upgrade over the excellent enthusiast level Sony A6300?

The 75 300 isn't the best

I have got the sony A6300 is it worth upgradin to this ?

And no comparison in price... Sony A6400 E-mount compact mirrorless camera body and Camera with 55-210 mm Lens Bundle £1,017.00 at amazon.

All modern cameras can take good photos, just you have better choices for similar money. Bundled with the 50mm in the past for the same price makes it better value and I can suggest it if you don't want to pay a penny more, but I don't like the fact that they offer the kit lens without image stabilization, clear rip off for the first time buyers, as many will not notice it in the beginning.

After going to my local camera shop, pre lockdown a few months ago I ended up with a vintage EOS 30D and love it. Magnesium Alloy body, nice and chunky for my big hands and the quality feel is a joy. It has an 8 thousandth shutter which for sport and nature overtakes one of these modern cameras by a mile.

Would this be too much for taking product images? Need something fast to take good photos and easy to transfer to pc. Any recommendations pls?

I have this camera and I love it, really simple to use and you can get some great photos with it.

Good deals coming up here regularly, last time was the panasonic gx80, about a week ago..

Sold out!

Great price, I ve this model and have no issues with it.

Excellent price, this model offers one of the best specs for the money in the Canon range.

Good price.

This or the more expensive 2000d?

Stock in Daventry

bought today

no stock...

That nifty 50 is £100 just on its own

I just checked the first result, that makes it an even better choice for people already invested in the canon ecosystem.

EF lenses easily adapt seamlessly on efm bodies, I got several adapters from the original Canon to the cheapest £20 on ebay, all work fine, hardly notice any difference. The viltrox above its a good choice.

This Viltrox convertor will do the same job for £32.

It's a good camera but it's nowhere near as good as the Sony range. Their colour science and AF is unmatched. I'd only get this if you're already a Canon user, as the lens converter for DSLR to mirrorless is like 100 quid.

Much better off getting a refurbished/used 550d

The 2000D is a bit better in this respect but the older processor in it limits the ISO range and it’s not so great in low light. Also the mount on this is metal as opposed to the plastic used in the 4000D. My daughter is using one for her A level photography course and has not had a problem with it so far.

Had the same thought myself. It might be okay as a first time DSLR for a beginner that isn't sure they want to spend much more, but personally I think you'd be better off going for a better spec second hand. If you do get serious about photography then I think you will be looking to replace this quite quickly.

Good price but this camera gets quite poor reviews. Shame really as I’m in the market for a good, cheap camera.

Expired, sadly.

this is a bargain price

Won't let me order to the UK

And the disadvantages too. Crop frame is better for macro as the depth of field is better, the only real advantage FF has is slightly shallower depth of field and a little better noise control. If you are using a FF camera for portraiture then that is its best strength, but if not the crop frame mirrorless is the better choice. DSLR has an issue with mirror slap which means an image can be compromised by the mirror flipping up, it's also compromised by the final element of the lens being further away from the film plane than it could be, and the mirrorless cameras eliminate this. Then there's size and weight. They're just too high profile and if the numerous theives and muggers don't get you the jobsworths will. Small compact camera generate less interest and that means you can get better shots than any other camera.

Watch the YouTube videos on it. You'll see how close it comes to being full frame with an extra stop of light. It's a great piece of kit and not a breaker of the bank.

You get some of the advantages tho, as the FF look, focal length without the crop, and one stop more light.

Yeah me too ;(

But the camera will never be full frame& the advantage of full frame will be lost.

I went for 200D some pros and cons for both so I went for the cheapest at the time- some great deals for new on eBay I got mine with both lens for £360

Heres a review Ive no idea to be honest if you have canon glass then maybe canon otherwise I would be getting Olympus at the cheaper end and Sony at the higher end depends on your budget and if your already invested in a system Review for canon m50 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mxx51eVz9fY

What about the Canon M50?

ah_heng: Probably the lens are worth more than the body.. :) No and no. These are the cheapest lenses canon offers, no IS and nothing special about them, absolute basic. The 50mm is decent, but nothing more than that. Body cheap, plasticy and outdated. This is a bad deal, plenty of other better choices for a little more.

Probably the lens are worth more than the body.. :)

Nice, but import charges are highly likely. Read the T&c's - You will be the importer of the good not HDEW.

Cheers, I’ll check this out now.

Thanks. That’s a bargain for the body only! Now to choose a lens (y)

Check this guy, sums it up very well And if you have the chance to try them is shop, even better, because the ergonomics/controls and how feel in the hand are quite different.

A6400, because it has an EVF viewfinder, better af especially eye af and tracking from distance, animal af, sharper 4k, longer battery, unlimited filming duration, can shoot silent burst for wildlife work, bigger buffer. Sony lens selection gives upgrade path to full frame and is comprehensive. Best of all you can get it for just £569 body only as an import, just like this import deal. The high res sensor is the best thing about this Canon but too many other things are missing IMO.

Just received an 200D so I’m very happy :D

I think you'll have to look on the webpage.

Would it be ok for detailed pictures of products? With the included lens?

I know it’s very strange, I’ve ordered it but a little worried I will get 2000d

Apologies, I didn't see that one on its pages. Very strange that Argos have the same product on there for different prices.

Is this better than the canon M6 deal?

I don't think I've ever used it in auto. I use the middle focus point to select what I'm focusing on, half depress the button to lock the focus, then I recompose my shot before pressing to open the shutter. I'm no expert, it's just how I do it. I would love to know why selecting an AF point would be better and which scenarios would benefit from this, because I genuinely don't know.

Hmm.. so why aren’t all cameras 9 focus points. Why for instance say Sony a6000 -179 focus points, a7 -425.. ? yes if your running it in manual but this is a beginners camera so I would presume it would be mostly used in auto.

I don't understand why this is important, I only ever use one focus point when I'm shooting with the mirror, the one in the middle. I focus then recompose. Maybe I'm missing something?

I've one of these and I think it's amazing. Absolute bargain. That lens isn't great but enough to get you started.

Deal reactivated, still available.

I want a small form camera for my upcoming holiday to Japan. I had the original EOS-M which I liked. But I wanted something like an RX100 or G7X so I don't have to mess around with lenses. But this sure is tempting.

Reduced further to £344.99!

Arguments in favor of the Canon EOS 250D: > Better jpgs: Has a more modern image processing engine (DIGIC 8 vs DIGIC 7). > Better video: Provides higher definition movie capture (4K/25p vs 1080/60p). > Easier framing: Has an optical viewfinder for image composition and settings control. > More flexible LCD: Has a swivel screen for odd-angle shots in portrait or landscape orientation. > Longer lasting: Can take more shots (1070 versus 295) on a single battery charge. > More modern: Reflects 2 years and 1 month of technical progress since the M6 launch. Reasons to prefer the Canon EOS M6: > Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (9 vs 5 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment. > More compact: Is smaller (112x68mm vs 122x93mm) and will fit more readily into a bag. > Less heavy: Has a lower weight (by 59g or 13 percent) and is thus easier to take along. > More legacy lens friendly: Can use many non-native lenses via adapters. > Easier device pairing: Supports NFC for fast wireless image transfer over short distances. > More heavily discounted: Has been around for much longer (launched in February 2017). Full review here.

Is this better than a cannon 250d?

Not a lot in it.

whats better....... This Cannon or a Fujifilm X-T100? Thx

The M6 is better in every respect than the 4000D. The 4000D is Canon's cheapest DSLR and it shows! The lenses you get in the kit aren't the best although they are cheaper to buy than the EF-M lenses needed for the M6 but you can get an adaptor to use EF-S lenses. This comparison may help you to decide. If it's a full size DSLR you want then spend a bit more and get the 2000D rather than the 4000D.

Not sure which one to get? This or the £315 with both lenses or another one?

Yeah I've updated the deal for the silver one (y)

Thank you Pwel appreciate that :)

Hi. Would a used Nikon d3400d be better

No imo, both lenses are the very bottom end of canons line up, without IS, so ideally you need bright light or tripod. At least the other bundlehas the 50mm/1.8 which is a very decent lens, give you some after sunset shooting and background separation capabilities. Just keep in mind you are buying low end, ok for the price if that's your budget, personally I would prefer to spend couple hundred quid more, and get stabilization on the kit lens, one prime and a more decent telephoto lens if you need one, like the 55-250 if it's canon.

Which ones a better deal this one or the Argos one?

Is this worth the 30 quid or so extra from the deal with the smaller lense? ; https://www.hotukdeals.com/deals/canon-eos-4000d-dslr-camera-with-18-55mm-50mm-lenses-at-argoa-3386871

Sorry, way out of my knowledge. I would assume you would need a much longer zoom than 55mm lens depending on how close you get to the animals.

Would you recommend this camera for safari photography in Kenya?

Would this camera be okay for a short safari in Kenya??

It's "almost the same camera" the same way as the latest iPhone is "almost the same as iPhone 3".

And your point is?

I have a canon 77d but am going to upgrade to a full frame canon, but just not sure which one yet - I’m doing a lot of research, so I don’t waste any more money! But I love canon and will always buy canon.(y)

What camera did you end up settling on? (y)

I would advise you to stick with what you have for now - I made the mistake of buying various lenses etc before I had mastered photography, only to regret my purchases - I have since traded them in to buy what I really want, but have wasted a lot of money in the process. ;)

Thanks for the insights, I do like the idea of the touchscreen and full frame mirrorless but overall I guess the Nikon is a good starter.

My opinion is for beginners the Nikon is slightly better suited for Landscape shots.The Nikon seems to produce more vibrant landscape images straight out of camera than my Canon. I use mine mostly for Portrait shots and really like how the Canon deals with skin tones, Of course both can be adjusted with post processing.

Showing as out of stock now (annoyed)

Could always but something like a canon 600d and see if you get into it

Bought 1 thanks

Probably not to be fair. I’m thinking the Panasonic will be better suited for me

Can you see yourself getting into it enough to buy and carry different lenses?