Canon EOS Deals & Offers

cold - 1300d is cheaper and better take a look at the build of it - its the worst canon i have ever seen edit: wait a sec you've made a hash of this thread neotrix, deal price is for camera and 2 lenses but you only list one of them also the lens is obviously 18-55 not 15-88 there is also cashback available but not sure if get a proper currys receipt or not edit2: infact i still think its cold if no cashback

Sooooo tempted

Currys have made an absolute dogs dinner with this ad, the description the title etc.

Just the same as most of the old 16mp sony nex - the 20mp is not noticeable over 16. The lens is compact but . . . . min. f3.5 Look at used nex at cex 2 year g'tee The 16mp olympus models are good too - I use nex, a5000 and olly 16mp Sigma lenses work well on these. Sony's are good for old manual lenses too.

And the Sony 20mm is handy

I just bought the sigma 16 1.4 which is brilliant

There’s a good chance these will be display models unless one or two stores have a couple left obvs. None in South Wales

Good camera, but no viewfinder unfortunately. Voted hot.

Happy 1000th (y) Have some heat!

same, 40mm max here for a casual beater. 38 is the sweet spot

Nice looking watch but would look stupid on my thin wrists

Nice looking watch heat

Nice watch, I like that. Shame I've literally just bought a new one or I'd be tempted with this! Heat added :)

You could help prospective buyers by dropping a link :)

riiiiight, made up then

Do your own research

you still haven't linked to the d3300 with kit lens and a wide angle zoom for 400quid - this is the 2nd time you've said its cheaper (new uk stock)

More Megapixels, better resolution sensor. Weighs less, higher Video resolution, better Autofocus, better in darker light, cheaper. The main fact is whatever lens you put on the Nikon it will give a sharper and better image then the equivilant Canon Lens. That’s not opinion that’s stonewall. the only reason to buy the Canon is for the lens and buying into that eco system as you will outgrow the body in weeks but at least you will still have the lens to put on a better body should you upgrade.

Ah gawd damn it. I hope the watch doesn't go funny then! :|

The warranty is with Toby deals. States on website its with them. Plus Apple warranty applied when bought from selected 3rd party sellers. Pretty sure Toby deals isn’t one of them.

Who's site says what?

Pretty sure ur Apple Watch doesn’t come with the manufacturer warranty. Even says so on their site

Just gone up to £399. Must be popular

Been looking for a cheap daily driver with sapphire glass, decided to go for this. Ill report back once I see it in person.

Great price for a sapphire glass watch as well.

1 Really, I can't believe how dumb I was; I could easily have had (and real Japanese ones - not Chinese replicas). Missed opportunities. Grrr, fuming!

This was £99.99 a few weeks ago and I took the plunge and bought it. Great watch and looks even better in the flesh - so to speak. Even for the extra few £, it's a great buy. Heat!

Good spot - heat.

The kit lens (zoom) isn't a pancake. That's the (awesome) 22mm f/2 lens for around £210.

For those that don't know you can chose to not see comments made by certain individuals by going onto their profile and selecting, "mute member" ;)

Same price at Wex + Quidco https://www.wexphotovideo.com/canon-eos-m100-digital-camera-body-black-1636560/?

The a6000 is unbeatable if you get it at the right price

Tell me what a Sony a9 can’t do then that a dslr can?!

Wish I had bought this instead of my Tag. Been returned 5 times for different faults. Twice for water ingress alone. Good deal

I've ordered it, so we shall see :)

£129 now :(

Free returns with amazon, still at 45mm diameter isn't too big 8)

Would this watch be too big for a 6.7 inch wrist?

The 75-300 is a very average lens, without IS it will be usable only in bright light conditions. The 50mm/1.8 and 10-18mm are good image quality lenses and IMO more useful and helpful for a starter to develop his skills. Shame that have to pay on the Argos deal for the useless dock station.

Thanks JimmyLo & Bendown. Think I will go for the Curries option since it should give me the best of both worlds with near and far lenses, dont need the share station as will connect via wifi Cheersn 8)

The 50mm fixed lens should give you better quality images as there is less glass between the sensor and the image than the 18-55 lens at 50. The 50mm is also a faster lens so better in low light conditions and better at separating the foreground by blurring the background, useful for portraits and cinematic videos.

But you get the 50mm at f1.8 rather than approx f5.6 on the 18-55mm kit lens which will make a massive difference to the photos you take

But surely you have 50mm with the 18-55 zoom?

Would this be ideal for someone just starting out, not sure if photography is for them, just wanting to get their feet wet? From some of these comments selling the station & 10-18mm lens would make it around £200, could perhaps then get a cheaper lens to play around with as well as the other one that comes with it, 18-55mm

Check for best camera prises in https://www.eglobalcentraluk.com Delivery fast, no duty and customer service ok . My self i saved at least £500 in last two years. as i like new technologies and i change my camera twice already . If any one know cheaper place than eglobal pls write in a coments . Thank u

(embarrassed) I haven't played around with those settings. Lol. I was going to swap lenses on the d600 too. But as you say if i do learn the stops I can do it all with one lens. I hear some people just use the 35mm or the 85mm lens on their Nikon cameras

Yes. I put dial on P. Worked for me most of the time. Always required me to put the flash on though to stop pics being blurry. On the Nikon d600 I can take pics without the flash and still get great results. I have the 50mm 1.8 now but ordered the 1.4 so I can use use in even lower light condition and still get great results

Thanks ElGofre. That information is very useful

The deal won’t become super hot and for the casual observer here I just want to reiterate that the reason is the seller. The price and spec is very good. If you’re worried about the seller but this is your budget then occasionally you can pick one up at this price from eBay and if you want brand new then likewise eBay has some deals around the £485 price. Pay with PayPal, if it doesn’t arrive you’re protected by their buyer protection. If you’re desperately in need of one and this is what you want that’s highly unusual and you’re probably already prepared to stretch your budget for a higher priced and more reputable seller elsewhere. If you’re looking for this and a nifty fifty and you want a reputable seller then beware the curry’s one on a deal at the minute for £579 or so is the mark three lens which is actually not as good as the mark two IS lens, IS being image stabilisation which is useful for macro shots where hand movements can mess up a perfect shot.

grey import, poorly rated seller buyer beware

Great price! Heat added

Thinking of the 1300D deal purely because it includes the 35-70 lens? Just get one from eBay and expect to pay 35-50 quid or so. This one with half hour left is £30 just now. If you want it, buy it, if you want to know the price they go for well from a half hour on you can click it and see what the auction ended at.

You missed out the part where an SLR can't even do video autofocusing properly. At least an iPhone can do that. This Canon can't. You need a special lens which you have to buy separately for this canon to do silent video autofocusing and I'm not even sure buying that lens is enough for this canon to accomplish that task properly. The bulk is also a major problem. Go for mirrorless instead. Same quality but less bulk and can do video autofocus properly.

I did think the question a troll comment too, there's not much trust to be had on the internet nowadays, that said it's actually not a bad question as it gives a chance to explain what SLR is all about, especially to those who enjoy photography on their phone and want to step it up. As well as those things mentioned, like sensor size differences, another massive difference is the ability to change lens. It's not uncommon to buy a lens which costs more than the camera itself; put a bad lens on an awesome camera, you'll get a bad photo. That piece of glass is vital, the camera is fed by light so it's only as good as the thing that catches the light for it. With an SLR you can buy a lens that is perfectly designed for a certain function, be it landscape shots, portrait, or macro close up shots. Not something an iPhone could ever offer. Control. SLRs are designed around control of the light that enters the camera, it's through this control that people are able to take amazing night photos of the stars, or those beautiful portrait shots. Shutter speed, aperture and ISO are the three main players, they all alter how light behaves when it enters the camera and hits that sensor. Those who buy an SLR and leave it in Auto have really bought the wrong kit. Don't get me wrong, they'll still see an improvement in the quality of the photo, but not enough to justify the cost and switch, in my opinion, a real waste of a great tool. You must put a little effort in to learn how to use said tool, that dial with A, S, M etc. on it is there for a reason. Snobbery. If you're a good photographer, an IPhone X and other cam phones like it, can still take a great picture. Composition, timing and other factors can still result in some cracking shots that will stand the test of time, some SLR snobs might argue otherwise. However, the exact same shot in the hands of someone who knows how to use an SLR will look that much more awesome. Combine the large sensor, with the changeable lens and the control you get on SLRs, you should start to see what's different about them and an iPhone X.

Purchased one. Box wasn't factory sealed. Looked a decent basic camera for the price.

I wasn’t trying to compare them, just commenting on others who were. I have a mix of mainly STM and USM lenses for my Canon, never had an issue with lens noise when refocusing but I know the standard lenses have this issues from people I work with. The STM nifty fifty can’t be heard on mine when I do video and that’s the nearest equivalent spec of the Sony which is twice the price.

They are not really equivalent as the Sony kit lenses on their mirrorless cameras are silent during autofocusing. This is especially important for video. These cheap Canon lenses probably aren't silent in use so are useless for video autofocus. How much more do you have to pay for silent autofocus lenses on the Canon? I'm not sure this canon can even do decent video autofocusing even with the more expensive silent lenses attached.