Unfortunately, this deal has expired 28 May 2023.
Men's Tudor Black Bay 32 Automatic Watch £1,856 @ David M Robinson
Men's Tudor Black Bay 32 Automatic Watch £1,856 @ David M Robinson
Men's Tudor Black Bay 32 Automatic Watch £1,856 @ David M Robinson
*
207°
31
Posted 14 April 2023

Men's Tudor Black Bay 32 Automatic Watch £1,856 @ David M Robinson

£1,856
Free · David M Robinson Deals
Kato_MV's avatar
Shared by
Kato_MV
Joined in 2020
4
118

About this deal

This deal is expired. Here are some options that might interest you:

More Watch deals

Find more like this

See all deals

Discover more deals on our homepage

Original price: £2320

I believe these models are using the ETA Swiss movements and are now discontinued, they don't show on the official website anymore.

They have been replaced with models with case sizes of 31 mm which use the in-house movements and starting at over £3000.

Model: M79580-0002
Brand: TUDOR
Case Diameter: 32 mm
Collection: Black Bay
Guarantee: 5 years
Movement: Automatic
Recipient: Ladies
Strap Material: Leather
Watch Glass Type: Sapphire Crystal
Water Resistant Depth: 150M/15BAR

There is a nice written review here:
monochrome-watches.com/tud…ce/
David M Robinson More details at
facebook logoPosttwitter logoTweetwhatsapp logoShare
Community Updates
Edited by a community support team member, 14 April 2023
New Comment

You may also like

31 Comments

sorted by
's avatar
  1. Bobbins's avatar
    Bobbins
    Not a desirable watch, with a £100 bog standard ETA 2824 movement. The only reason Tudor is any way desirable is that you can’t buy their Rolex parent watch.

    Buy a Christopher Ward with their new dual flag logo for one third of the cost and you will still get a Swiss movement and as watch of similar quality.
    Kato_MV's avatar
    Kato_MV Author
    First of all I would be interested to know where you can get an ETA 2824 for £100, a brand new one would be at least double that amount (if you can still find them).

    Secondly, Tudor uses a COSC certified movement with several modifications, with the 2 most notable being the balance wheel shock absorber and the regulating system.

    Tudor ETA:
    49982723-NpynA.jpg

    Regular ETA (standard version):
    49982723-Y4Ve5.jpg
  2. BarneyRubble's avatar
    BarneyRubble
    Says it's for males on the product page
    tony.dixon's avatar
    tony.dixon
    49979960-lbpog.jpg

    Many men of our grandparents generation wore watches this size. It’s small by todays standards but can be worn by anyone
  3. Phlop0's avatar
    Phlop0
    Watch case sizes are trending down. Bit of a push for most men this size I reckon.

    I can't pull it off. My arms are too muscley and masculine. It's a shame
    M_z's avatar
    M_z
    Ahh, but would wearing a small watch make my puny wrists look large and muscular?
  4. damonb1's avatar
    damonb1
    Ive slim wrists but happily wear anything up to 40mm. Ive some vintage dress watches in the 32mm range that go well with anything and 40 that are better with long sleeve shirts. Basically I'll wear anything if it takea my fancy
  5. exexpat's avatar
    exexpat
    49980028-klN4F.jpg
  6. Kato_MV's avatar
    Kato_MV Author
    Just though I should mention I didn't put 'Men's' in the title, it was the moderators.

    I personally believe that at 32 mm this size this is a ladies watch, as the specification states, but feel free to disagree.
  7. jonobailey's avatar
    jonobailey
    I'm not one for saying that a small watch is automatically a women's watch and it annoys me when people say that a man's watch needs to be 40mm plus, but......

    This is a womens watch without questions, 32mm is tiny. Women's watches also do not sell as well so don't think this deal is that good (Goldsmiths had it at 50% off not long ago)
  8. villan57's avatar
    villan57
    How about its unisex
  9. jut1972's avatar
    jut1972
    Voted hot cos it's a nice watch deal
  10. Tyranicus66's avatar
    Tyranicus66
    38mm is the current sweet spot, a move down from 41/40mm a couple of years ago. By my reckoning this will be in fashion by about 2050 by which time my wrists will have atrophied like raisins in the sun, making this watch too large.
  11. vishy01234's avatar
    vishy01234
    Sorry but in this day and age, 32mm is definitely a woman's watch. And I'm a great defender of men wearing watches from 34mm and above, but you're simply on dodgy territory at 32mm. You'll even be debated on 34mm to 36mm, at least for a sports watch. Not so much for a dress watch. But 32mm - no bueno.
  12. skdotcom's avatar
    skdotcom
    I only have a 17.5cm wrist, but I find a 35mm watch to be the smallest that looks right for me.

    Nice looking watch though, and a good price.
  13. hugekebab's avatar
    hugekebab
    Tooodorrrrrrr
  14. michaeldudley's avatar
    michaeldudley
    Toodear 
  15. tom6195's avatar
    tom6195
    i quite like the look of this. 32mm + the bezel length is more like 40mm to be fair
    Scrooge_McDuck's avatar
    Scrooge_McDuck
    32mm is the complete diameter of case minus the crown so I have no idea what you mean by 40mm including the "bezel length".

    The only measurement that could possibly be close to 40mm would be lug-to-lug...ie from tip of one of the top lugs to tip of one of the bottom. This is still tiny for a mans watch.
  16. mark_trev's avatar
    mark_trev
    £2350 for the 41mm on bracelet at Burrells
    £2050 for the silver dialed 36mm on bracelet (the better buy IMO than this)
  17. dam14n1's avatar
    dam14n1
    Nice, will have to pawm my longine now.
  18. john.coote's avatar
    john.coote
    A32 is aimed at women - tiny
's avatar