Unfortunately, this deal is no longer available
1193°
Posted 14 May 2013

Kingston 240GB HyperX 3K SSD 2.5" SATA-III Read = 555MB/s, Write = 510MB/s for £129.99 @ Ebuyer

£129.99
Shared by
Daley_Deals
Joined in 2013
1,442
2,839

About this deal

This deal is expired. Here are some options that might interest you:

More SSD deals

Find more like this

See all deals

Discover more deals on our homepage

My track record at posting god deals for Hard drives hasn't been that good so far :>)
This looks like a good price for a fast SSD drive though.
Add a 2.5" Hard Drive Enclosure - Black for £4.99

The HyperX 3K loads games and applications faster, increases frames per second (FPS) for an improved gaming experience and allows for quick transfers and edits of large media ­files.

HyperX 3K provides high-speed SATA Rev. 3.0 (6Gb/s) performance and blazing fast random and sequential read/write speeds. SandForce DuraClass technology provides the latest data integrity protection for ultimate endurance over the entire life of the drive.

HyperX 3K SSD comes in a sleek, black and aluminium case design, accentuating the look of any power user’s system. For added peace of mind.

HyperX 3K SSD is backed by a three-year warranty and legendary Kingston reliability. Applications
Decreased load times of high-resolution PC games
Increased frame rates per second for a better gaming experience
Faster transfers of large media files
Multitasking
Movie downloads, transfers and syncs
This SSD is designed for use in desktop and notebook computer workloads, and is not intended for server environments.

In the Box
2.5" SSD
3.5" bracket and mounting screws

Specifications
Form factor 2.5"
Controller SandForce® SF-2281
Components MLC NAND (3k P/E Cycles)
Interface SATA Rev 3.0 (6Gb/s), SATA Rev 2.0 (3Gb/s)
Capacities 90GB, 120GB, 240GB, 480GB
Sequential reads SATA-III - 555MB/s
Sequential writes SATA-III - 510MB/s
Sustained random 4K R/W - 240GB – 40,000/57,000 IOPS
Max. random 4K R/W - 240GB – 86,000/60,000 IOPS
PCMARK Vantage HDD Suite Score 60,000
Supports SMART, TRIM, and Garbage Collection
Power consumption 0.455 W (TYP) idle / 1.58 W (TYP) read / 2.11 W (TYP) write
Dimensions 69.85mm x 100mm x 9.5mm
Weight 97g
Operating temperatures 0°C ~ 70°C
Storage temperatures -40°C ~ 85°C
Shock resistance 1500G
Vibration operating 2.17G
Vibration non-operating 20G
MTBF 1,000,000 hrs
Ebuyer More details at
Ebuyer has currently Make your First Order and you and the referrer both get £10 Off campaign, if you want to use it you can do so from this .
Community Updates
New Comment

98 Comments

sorted by
's avatar
  1. Awaken's avatar
    C'mon, 920+ degrees? It's an averagey price for an averagy drive.

    It's a quick drive, but not sensational, the truth is for most desktop users you wouldn't notice the better than average sequential write speeds.

    That "3k" in the title isn't a plus point either - these digs at the 840 for TLC, and then bigging up this drive with a clearly stated and intentional reduced life expectancy is making me smile! Of course it doesn't really matter and will still last plenty long enough in the real world - just like the TLC samsungs will. And it's sandforce based - again, not a plus point. By now most of the bugs have been sorted but it's still the least stable controller in the mainstream, with the possible exception of some indilinx drives.

    It's ok. It's not that hot. You can pick up a variety of high end drives 240 - 256gb around £120-140 at the moment, get lucky and its less - like the £115 amazon samsung 840 not long ago.

    Finally, remember it's 240gb, which puts it a bit on the small side in it's category! A crucial M4 for example has a whole 16 extra gigabytes! Enough to cover most of your windows install for example
  2. nomnomnomnom's avatar
    capriboycraig

    Almost 50p/gb - faster read write than the Sammy 840 and biggest bonus is … Almost 50p/gb - faster read write than the Sammy 840 and biggest bonus is it isn't TLC nand like the Sammy.Heated.



    With the massive downside of being based on the SF-2281, which is the single most unreliable controller ever released for an SSD.

    Sure, it's better now, but people still suffer random BSOD issues with this chipset. I've been there and it ain't fun. It's most certainly not 100% fixed and other forum posts around the web back this up.

    That to one side though, I can't put up with the crappy Sandforce speeds when it comes to non-compressible data. the headline speeds for this drive can only be hit in very specific situations with the correct data, where it's much more consistent with a Sammy / Crucial.

    Heat though, because it's the best price for this drive.
  3. capriboycraig's avatar
    Almost 50p/gb - faster read write than the Sammy 840 and biggest bonus is it isn't TLC nand like the Sammy.

    Heated.
  4. capriboycraig's avatar
    I say it often But if anyone has a nearly new 64/128 they need to sell reasonably to fund this I'm all ears - SATA 3 preferred but would consider 2 for the right deal.

  5. deleted756153's avatar
    Nice find. If anyone is on a budget/dosent need much space. The 120gb version is £85 delivered....

    ebuyer.com/363…AGA
  6. dwl99's avatar
    A good reason to avoid using either of these retailers IMHO.
  7. WesD84's avatar
    18001243-qn7u2

    Just ordered mine
  8. Rawrb's avatar
    richto

    No you are not. The retailer is responsible. UK law provides protection … No you are not. The retailer is responsible. UK law provides protection from faulty goods for up to 6 years.


    That's a myth propagated by sites like MSE and Which?. The law is all about interpretation and states goods should be free from manufacturing defects and last a "reasonable" length of time. It is (arguably) deliberately vague and puts the onus on the consumer to convince the manufacturer and ultimately a judge what a reasonable length of time is. When dealing with a fault, one needs to prove it was present at the time of manufacture or as a direct result of the manufacturing process. i.e, make the manufacturer liable.

    In such cases you are far better presenting your claim straight to the manufacturer as it removes a layer of confusion with the retailer not accepting responsibility and instead acting as middle man. Manufacturers will also generally be more willing to absorb a loss. It doesn't matter who the law says your original contract was with. It just adds further complication when you try and make a retailer responsible for a manufacturers liability.

    The best chance of success is to just to present your case with some intelligence and persistence, let the other party know you are prepared to test it in court but avoid silly claims like the 6 year myth. Their legal department will rip you to shreds! Better to play on the fact when it costs them more to deal with your letters and handle the negative PR, than the amount you are claiming AND that your claim could be considered "reasonable". It's bad business for them to fight you.

    I'm not knocking sites like MSE or Which? as they educate people on their rights, but they shouldn't pass off interpretation as fact unless they're prepared to fight the battle for you. Plus, while they're sending people in guns blazing with wild legal claims, it makes peeps like me with our polite letters look "reasonable"
  9. deleted30359's avatar
    mehmeh

    That's a myth propagated by sites like MSE and Which?. The law is all … That's a myth propagated by sites like MSE and Which?. The law is all about interpretation and states goods should be free from manufacturing defects and last a "reasonable" length of time. It is (arguably) deliberately vague and puts the onus on the consumer to convince the manufacturer and ultimately a judge what a reasonable length of time is. When dealing with a fault, one needs to prove it was present at the time of manufacture or as a direct result of the manufacturing process. i.e, make the manufacturer liable.In such cases you are far better presenting your claim straight to the manufacturer as it removes a layer of confusion with the retailer not accepting responsibility and instead acting as middle man. Manufacturers will also generally be more willing to absorb a loss. It doesn't matter who the law says your original contract was with. It just adds further complication when you try and make a retailer responsible for a manufacturers liability.The best chance of success is to just to present your case with some intelligence and persistence, let the other party know you are prepared to test it in court but avoid silly claims like the 6 year myth. Their legal department will rip you to shreds! Better to play on the fact when it costs them more to deal with your letters and handle the negative PR, than the amount you are claiming AND that your claim could be considered "reasonable". It's bad business for them to fight you. I'm not knocking sites like MSE or Which? as they educate people on their rights, but they shouldn't pass off interpretation as fact unless they're prepared to fight the battle for you. Plus, while they're sending people in guns blazing with wild legal claims, it makes peeps like me with our polite letters look "reasonable"



    Wrong. It's the law. It is very clear and it is relatively easily enforceable.

    Good summary here: news.bbc.co.uk/1/h…stm

    "Goods are of satisfactory quality if they reach the standard that a reasonable person would regard as satisfactory, taking into account the price and any description."

    So for instance a computer hard drive would likely be expected by a reasonable person to last at least 6 years. I don't think you would have any difficulty in presenting that in a Small Claims Court as a reasonable view.

    Manufacturers warranty might be an easier route while it lasts, but the responsibility is still with the retailer.
    (edited)
  10. deleted24178's avatar
    I wont buy from ebuyer
    been burned by their rotten customer service twice
    M
  11. wide's avatar
    I can see why this is getting so hot and it does look good enough to have some kind of sex with but 4K RANDOM READ PEOPLE!

    ssdboss.com/ssd…III
    (edited)
  12. Myriad's avatar
    rustysquirrel

    HELP!anyone know if this works on a macbook pro 2012 13"and how well it … HELP!anyone know if this works on a macbook pro 2012 13"and how well it works.



    _digital__

    HI all, will this work on a macbook pro (2010)?.Thanks in advance,



    Yes, the drive will fit - it has a 9mm x 2.5" form factor and will fit right into your current hard drive bay and work as it should
    (edited)
  13. deleted494932's avatar
    Pluun

    Am I supposed to understand this? oO



    Short answer - no. I would rather you didn't understand my comment.
     
    However, working on the basis that there are other people that don't understand my comment, here's a little explanation;
    My comment on this thread was written in a hurry. Yes, I could have made it a little easier on the eyes....but it is hardly indecipherable! The salient bits of information were as follows;

    - I bought the 120GB drive last year for £64 (the price has therefore risen by a tenner)
    - The drive failed
    - The drive was extremely quick
    - Having gone through that drive failure, I would personally stick with the rock solid Samsung 830 series.

    Judging by some of your deal descriptions, you probably shouldn't be criticising others;
    hotukdeals.com/dea…939 (edited)
  14. deleted36778's avatar
    mehmeh

    ^^ Winner, now hug it out you two :pMy drive arrived today. Very … ^^ Winner, now hug it out you two :pMy drive arrived today. Very impressed and insanely quick. Time will tell on the reliability question.



    {{{{{{{{ }}}}}}}
    (edited)
  15. djfluff's avatar
    ChooseBlues

    If someone knowledgeable would tell me if this would a) be compatible … If someone knowledgeable would tell me if this would a) be compatible with this laptop 'Toshiba Satellite U940-101' then I would be very grateful. I have goggled but I couldn't find a clear answer. If anyone would care to explain how I can find out myself, that would also be great thanks!


    The Crucial Site lists a 7mm drive for you laptop : crucial.com/sto…304
    So I would look at a different drive. amazon.co.uk/Sam…ssd is a great deal.
  16. willhatch's avatar
    nice. i do like a bit of Kingston.

    nearly time for an upgrade i think... sub £100 would be nice
  17. Rawrb's avatar
    I'm in!
  18. Minstadave's avatar
    capriboycraig

    Almost 50p/gb - faster read write than the Sammy 840 and biggest bonus is … Almost 50p/gb - faster read write than the Sammy 840 and biggest bonus is it isn't TLC nand like the Sammy.Heated.



    Yeah the 840 non-pro is meant to last 1000-1500 P/E cycles, so this looks pretty good.
  19. Dodge62's avatar
    Was trying to figure out why you'd want to put a superfast SSD into a superslow USB 2 caddy, but then realised this makes sense for transferring OS / files, particularly from a laptop.
  20. shadow_boxer's avatar
    Great price.
  21. 1apple's avatar
    hot
  22. deleted494932's avatar
    deals234

    Nice find. If anyone is on a budget/dosent need much space. The 120gb … Nice find. If anyone is on a budget/dosent need much space. The 120gb version is £85 delivered....http://www.ebuyer.com/363436-kingston-120gb-hyperx-3k-ssd-sh103s3-120g?utm_source=google&utm_medium=products&gclid=CKO1-tG4lbcCFUXJtAodvBUAGA



    I picked up one of these from Scan last year for £64 --- it failed, so I punted off the replacement hard drive at cost price. Kind of regret doing so, as this drive was exceptionally quick...
    (With that said, I would sooner go for a Samsung 830 drive -- bullet proof reliability is so much more important to me now!)
    (edited)
  23. tipsy1973's avatar
    why buy anything else, just with I had money.... hot!
  24. Happychappys's avatar
    Hi, would this be simple or ok to fit into an Asus EEEPC 1000HE ?

  25. stevvie's avatar
    Just brought one, was thinking of getting 2 in raid
    Thanks OP, have some heat from me.
    (edited)
  26. MrT04d's avatar
    Would not be my first choice of SSD, I had my share of reliability and consistency issues with my SandForce based Vertex 2 and 3 drives, but is a very good price for this drive so heat from me.
  27. deleted99850's avatar
    nah usb 2 is 35MB/s any old drive is faster than that.
  28. deleted756153's avatar
    zerospin

    I picked up one of these from Scan last year for £64 --- it failed, so I … I picked up one of these from Scan last year for £64 --- it failed, so I punted off the replacement hard drive at cost price. Kind of regret doing so, as this drive was exceptionally quick...(With that said, I would sooner go for a Samsung 830 drive -- bullet proof reliability is so much more important to me now!)



    I cant comment on the reliability. I found the same product with just a lower capacity so posted it up to help people. But thanks for the info.
  29. Megacamz's avatar
    If only I could afford this, such a **** bargain.
  30. minimoff's avatar
    same price at dabs.com too!

    and 4.04% TCB

    heat added
  31. Guan's avatar
    capriboycraig

    I say it often But if anyone has a nearly new 64/128 they need to … I say it often But if anyone has a nearly new 64/128 they need to sell reasonably to fund this I'm all ears - SATA 3 preferred but would consider 2 for the right deal.


    Ditto! Also after a reasonably priced 64Gb SSD.
    Missed this 40gb one by just a few minutes:
    hotukdeals.com/dea…708
  32. dwl99's avatar
    I just picked up a used Samsung 830 128GB for £77 from here but only one left now. 120 days' warranty. Only a couple of quid dearer than a new 840 120GB, fingers crossed for it not failing on day 121!


    (edited)
  33. Cyberpunk's avatar
    cheers, ordered. I got a Crucial M4 that I bought (128gb) just before all the price drops. Problem with this is that even though 128gb is a decent amount its not so great when you want to use it for games and im maxing out my secondary HDD. This should be quite good. Now, need to decide what to do with my M4.

    Hmmm...
  34. wetbandit's avatar
    I picked up the older Kingston SSD and seems to be working fine for me. It is 9 months old and performance is really good considering it was the mid range one.
  35. PR1's avatar
    is this Kingston's 'top end' drive, equivalent to e.g. 840 pro?
  36. wide's avatar
    I got into VirtualBox and now I'm running out of gigabytes on my Vertex3 so this is good news for me but I can't help leaning toward the 840 non-pro still.

    ebuyer.com/409…0bw

    How does ebuyer cashback work?
    (edited)
  37. nomnomnomnom's avatar
    PR1

    is this Kingston's 'top end' drive, equivalent to e.g. 840 pro?



    No, the 840 Pro is better. It has a better controller and higher endurance along with a good 5 year warranty.

    wide

    How does ebuyer cashback work?



    Try clicking the big "Click here to learn more" in the middle of the page. It's even broken down into an easy to understand 5 stage process.
  38. THEMOSH70's avatar
    Love a God deal...
  39. wide's avatar
    nomnomnomnom

    Try clicking the big "Click here to learn more" in the middle of the … Try clicking the big "Click here to learn more" in the middle of the page. It's even broken down into an easy to understand 5 stage process.



    Yeah I saw the easy to understand 5 stage process... Then it said make sure you read the terms too. Ebuyer don't throw money away yet no one has posted ebuyer's £120 Samsung 840 deal - I'm asking what's the catch.
's avatar