Unfortunately, this deal has expired 21 November 2020.
*
316°
Posted 21 October 2020
Octopath Traveller £24.99 at Steam Store
Shared by
bman1979
Joined in 2013
182
520
About this deal
This deal is expired. Here are some options that might interest you:
Eight travelers. Eight adventures. Eight roles to play. Embark on an epic journey across the vast and wondrous world of Orsterra and discover the captivating stories of each of the eight travelers
More details at
Community Updates
Edited by a community support team member, 21 October 2020
14 Comments
sorted byThere *is* an overarching story! It's well hidden though. Without spoiling anything, it's accessed by completing a few specific sidequests.
Followed by the most difficult last boss in a jrpg ever concieved.
I havent played it to be honest but it does look cute
It's not a difficult grind, just a long one.
There's no overarching story, and you can't blast through a characters whole story, you have to do little parts of them one by one. The gameplay is fantastic and the graphics are beautful, but it's quite a shallow exeperience.
The last boss music is one of the best tracks in a game ever haha
There are some tricks to speed up the grind, some cats that give huge boost if you manage to kill them. If I remember, I was able to unlock all skills across all jobs pretty fast. I don't remember needing to grind to progress the story itself but I played it a while ago. I still think it is a bit overpriced for a 2D sprite based game. Price should be based on development cost, not length of gameplay.
... What? The development cost for a game like Octopath Traveler is substantial. Maybe not Red Dead Redemption or Uncharted huge but by your argument we should pay hundreds of pounds for a game like that. In reality the only reason these games get made is because they guarantee 10s of millions of sales to recoup those costs.
It's absolutely possible that Octopath cost somewhere in the realm of a typical AA game; it definitely cost millions. This assumption that sprite based games are cheap is completely wrong. (edited)