Unfortunately, this deal has expired 14 May 2023.
Seagate ZP2000GM30021 2TB Firecuda 510 SSD Internal £123.04 via Amazon EU on Amazon
Seagate ZP2000GM30021 2TB Firecuda 510 SSD Internal £123.04 via Amazon EU on Amazon
Seagate ZP2000GM30021 2TB Firecuda 510 SSD Internal £123.04 via Amazon EU on Amazon
Seagate ZP2000GM30021 2TB Firecuda 510 SSD Internal £123.04 via Amazon EU on Amazon
Seagate ZP2000GM30021 2TB Firecuda 510 SSD Internal £123.04 via Amazon EU on Amazon
Seagate ZP2000GM30021 2TB Firecuda 510 SSD Internal £123.04 via Amazon EU on Amazon
Seagate ZP2000GM30021 2TB Firecuda 510 SSD Internal £123.04 via Amazon EU on Amazon
Seagate ZP2000GM30021 2TB Firecuda 510 SSD Internal £123.04 via Amazon EU on Amazon
*
222°
Posted 15 March 2023

Seagate ZP2000GM30021 2TB Firecuda 510 SSD Internal £123.04 via Amazon EU on Amazon

£123.04
Shared by
RockstarRobbo Super Poster
Joined in 2011
3,103
2,059

About this deal

This deal is expired. Here are some options that might interest you:

More SSD deals

Find more like this

See all deals

Discover more deals on our homepage

Product details
Digital storage capacity2 TB
Hard disk interfaceNVMe
Connectivity technologyUSB
BrandSeagate
Hard disk form factor2280 Inches
Hard disk descriptionSolid State Drive
PCIe G3 ×4, NV Me 1.3
Up to 3400/2180 sequential read/write (Max, MB/s), 128KB
Up to 350K/530K random read/write (Max, IOPS), 4KB QD33
1.8M hours MTBF. Future Reliability Leverage an internal solid-state drive built for 1.8M hours MTBF and up to 3,600 TB TBW (Total Bytes Written)
5-Yr limited warranty
Amazon More details at

Community Updates
Edited by a community support team member, 15 March 2023
New Comment

You may also like

11 Comments

sorted by
's avatar
  1. Phenfinite's avatar
    The gen4 one, firecuda 520 is only £129.99 currently.
    SUPERKLIKACZ's avatar
    Where?
  2. Koyakami's avatar
    Sweet! Good price for old gen I got a server and a pc which aren’t pcie 4.0, so 2TB at this price seems good (edited)
    taz002dev's avatar
    Why would you choose this for server instead of some enterprise offerings? Asking since I am in the same position.

    I have a server and can have some power hungrier m.2 enterprise ssds within the same price. The downside is they’re 22110 and yes most likely more wats consumed

    The other downside when having servers is that I need about 3 at least ideally 5 (one sitting unused to replace any of the 3 working) and ideally another one to act as failsafe for the second failure.
    That is per server .
    If you have a failover backup server the add 2 more at least
    A whooping 7 in total just for storage/vms
    I am not talking about having the ones having os on!

    This calculationis just for 4tb used :-)

    That is zfs raid/ or better zfs raidz1
    Looking for someone to convince me the investment is not worth it. (edited)