Unfortunately, this deal is no longer available
922°
Posted 19 January 2013

Norton Internet Security 2013 / Norton 360 - 1 year (3 PC) £10

£10
Shared by
DD98
Joined in 2007
30
98

About this deal

This deal is expired. Here are some options that might interest you:

More Antivirus deals

Find more like this

See all deals

Discover more deals on our homepage

Norton Internet Security 2013 / Norton 360 for download for £10/12. Use code NORTON60VK to get this price. Please don't vote cold because of free alternatives, for people who want to use Norton this is a good deal, only £3.33 per computer for a year.

buy-static.norton.com/nor…tml?om_sem_cid=hho_sem_ic:gb:ggl:en:e|kw0000000559|14369297668&country=GB
More details at
Community Updates
New Comment

265 Comments

sorted by
's avatar
  1. deleted19131's avatar
    Save yourself £10, use Microsoft Security Essentials or Avast.
  2. deleted110017's avatar
    killie99

    Save yourself £10, use Microsoft Security Essentials or Avast.


    I agree! I've been using Microsoft Security Essentials for years and never had any problems.
    windows.microsoft.com/en-…ons
  3. deleted410173's avatar
    So many customers come in with Norton on their PC's, with Virus's in tow, claiming they've never had an issue with Norton and it's always worked, you go to scan their PC's because they run slowly, and what do you know... full... Pile of rubbish.
  4. sebmason's avatar
    Guys seriously, do not use norton. Even if they paid me I wouldn't use it. Resource heavy, if you have windows 8 Microsoft security essentials is built in! If you have 7 then just download that for free. Or even better get Linux or a mac
  5. deleted723845's avatar
    Always one isn't there!! @killie! Avast is crap. Thanks for the post!! Hear added
  6. deleted437479's avatar
    martynandsarahrichards

    Bloody idiots norton is fine. Just cheap ass people not wanting to pay … Bloody idiots norton is fine. Just cheap ass people not wanting to pay for it !



    Yes, it is idiotic to pay for something you can get for free, especially when the paid-product is worse than the free versions.

    Fools and their money are soon parted.
  7. deleted223427's avatar
    Waste of money, the worse anti-virus out there
  8. Ralph888's avatar
    Perhaps I'm in the minority here but Norton has caused issues in the past for me. It slows down my laptop and caused crashes. I have tried many versions over the years. I have currently been using Microsoft's free offering for more than 3 years and it has worked without issue. I reckon the designer's of the operating system know how to protect it the best!
  9. deleted437479's avatar
    If you value your PC's resources, avoid Norton 2013. Slows down systems. MSE for Win 7 or below or AVG Free 2013 for Win 8. Both free, both light on resources (very light in comparison to Norton) and neither have let me or anyone I know down.
  10. DJW12's avatar
    ourhome

    Not according to these reviews.



    Um, might want to recheck your link there buddy...: 'CNET editors rating: Outstanding! (4.5/ 5 stars!)'

    Also, check out any other review of Norton 2013 from any respectable website, and you will find that it is consistantly rated as the best antivirus you can buy.

    For example check this out for a full comparison of all the main Antiviruses: pcmag.com/art…ite

    Anyone who says that Norton is still horrible needs to get with the times!
  11. deanwall's avatar
    One final comment - make sure you go to your norton account online and disable the auto-renewal. Otherwise you'll be charged full price automatically once this subscription expires!
  12. kharma45's avatar
    thinkiwillhaveit

    Waste of money, the worse anti-virus out there



    lol far from it, Norton is one of the best at present and has been near the top for the last 3 or 4 versions.
  13. blitz7287's avatar
    Norton is a crap antivirus program. It just slows your system down with all the added crap in it. Just like McAfee does. I recommend ESET NOD32 and Malwarebytes.
  14. deleted242948's avatar
    Youngy

    So many questions.. You make your choices and let other people make … So many questions.. You make your choices and let other people make theirs. Corporations that use Endpoint Protection have industry standard hardware firewalls protecting their networks. Out of all the AV products I've used over the years the only one to let me down was MSE, so personally I'd rather spend a nominal £10 (hardly going to break the bank is it) and have peace of mind that Norton has always done me well.



    Your ignorance is dangerous.

    Firewalls don't typically protect you from malware. You're thinking of an IDS and even an IDS is only as good as the channels you route through it.

    If MSE let you down and you want something else, that's fine, but why not get something actually good? You ask anyone who actually works in IT and they will actively advise you against Norton and so will I.

    Again: E-Set, Kaspersky, and MalwareBytes are all high quality paid-for consumer products.
  15. royals's avatar
    killie99

    Save yourself £10, use Microsoft Security Essentials or Avast.



    avast is good, but MSE is terrible - was good until i got my first virus in 20 years+, so ive gone back to avast - never had a virus
  16. pyro90's avatar
    Waste of money
  17. russ's avatar
    kharma45

    lol far from it, Norton is one of the best at present and has been near … lol far from it, Norton is one of the best at present and has been near the top for the last 3 or 4 versions.



    I didn't realise it had improved, may look into it again. About 4-5 years ago it was horrible, used to slow my machine down to a crawl, good to hear they've been making it less bloated.
  18. deleted639978's avatar
    Bloody idiots norton is fine. Just cheap ass people not wanting to pay for it !
  19. rdann's avatar
    Why pay when you have AVG which does a good job, link this with Malwarebytes and you have the perfect PC security for Free!!
  20. deleted242948's avatar
    martynandsarahrichards

    Bloody idiots norton is fine. Just cheap ass people not wanting to pay … Bloody idiots norton is fine. Just cheap ass people not wanting to pay for it !



    If I was going to pay for AV this wouldn't be the one. In fact I would literally prefer to run with no anti-virus than Norton, 360, or PC-Tools. Bloatware and scareware of the worst kind.

    If you want GOOD paid-for AV then go check out Kaspersky and or ESET.

    If you want free then MSE (now called "Windows Defender" and included in Windows 8).
  21. mrmazz's avatar
    even at a tenner its still over priced imo!
  22. deleted242948's avatar
    Youngy

    You take this very personally don't you.



    Did you just respond to a post where I am pointing out cold hard facts about an article and suggest I am getting emotional about it? Did you hit reply on the wrong thing?
  23. anthony69's avatar
    Would you believe it.

    Removed Microsfoft Security Essentials and installed this.

    Straight away its found a threat running as a service on my computer, which MSE completely missed!.

    Nice, thankyou OP.

    NB: The whole process literally from removing MSE to installing Norton 360 must have taken less than a few minutes.

    [image missing]



    (edited)
  24. Spud211's avatar
    This may be cheap for a turd but its still a turd.

    Its a good price for some of the worst anti virus software out there - this is STILL one of the number 1 causes of slowdowns/problems on peoples PCs that I come across - and it's miles better than it used to be. Only last night I fixed a laptop that was crashing on bootup just by removing this rubbish.

    Save yourself £10 - either use common sense (in which case anti virus is pointless) or use any of the other alternatives that are not bloatware.

    edit: Note that many of the big name AV companies are just as bad - McAffee for example - they all seem to think they have to add so many features to differentiate themselves that they forget what we really want - simple, efficient, effective protection against viruses/stupid mistakes.
    (edited)
  25. deleted19131's avatar
    Honestly, I fix computers for a living and you are gaining aboslutey nothing by running Norton rather than MSA or Avast, sorry to burst people's bubble but you are being fleeced. It wouldn't surprise me if some of the people posting on here work for Norton. I could make a lot of money selling this to my customers but I don't. We have 9 computers in our house and I've ran MSE for 4 years and we've never had a virus that MSE hasn't dealt with and that's with 2 teenagers downloading god knows what.

    There are 2 types of people in the world, the one's that listen to sensible advice and suckers.
  26. deleted19131's avatar
    anthony69

    Thats what I was thinking - until I installed it an hour or so ago and it … Thats what I was thinking - until I installed it an hour or so ago and it flagged up some adware that was running on a service on my PC that MSE had completely missed!. (See my earlier post)



    That's adware, not a virus and you'll find every piece of AV software deals with adware differently. Many toolbars are adware but Norton won't flag the majority of them up because they have commercial links..
  27. wanderer_forest's avatar
    Norton is excellent! Slows down the system? Not for at least 3 years since they overhauled the software. I've got this on 2 PC's and it's VERY resource light.

    I often recommend Microsoft security essentials but Norton has faster updates and this includes an excellent firewall. You can't go wrong for less than £4.
  28. Youngy's avatar
    UnoriginalGuy

    Your ignorance is dangerous. Firewalls don't typically protect you … Your ignorance is dangerous. Firewalls don't typically protect you from malware. You're thinking of an IDS and even an IDS is only as good as the channels you route through it. If MSE let you down and you want something else, that's fine, but why not get something actually good? You ask anyone who actually works in IT and they will actively advise you against Norton and so will I. Again: E-Set, Kaspersky, and MalwareBytes are all high quality paid-for consumer products.



    Firewalls protect your network interfaces, to an extent. I'm not talking netgear SME rubbish,
    Kaspersky? Thats one of the worse of the lot. Crashes loads and hogs resources. I work in IT and know many people others who do also. Our company trialled all the big products Sophos/Symantec EP, their old SAV product, Kaspersky I agree the Norton of old was a resource hog, but its improved immensely. Symantec are the market leaders, it just works. Anti virus is an emotive subject, everyone has their own experiences. Anyone who still harps on about Norton needs to relook at it.
  29. mieciux's avatar
    I think you all forget about 1 important thing.

    This deal is not about free alternatives, it is about cheapest price for this product.

    People who buy this do not care about you having free alternative!!!

    Over 700 degree of heat kind of speaks for itself.

    So do not waste your breath unless you have found this cheaper.

    (edited)
  30. SnappersMocaps's avatar
    Look people, the key lesson to learn is that you would be a fool to place all your trust in a single AV product. While it is true that you should NOT have two ACTIVE AV installations, you can still have a second PASSIVE AV installation.

    I have my NIS as my active component, which i have had for many years, and it saves my **** at least once a month on average.

    Every week i will run a full Norton scan, then straight after i run a passive scanner, Malwarebytes Anti-Malware (Free Edition):

    Malwarebytes

    The PRO verision which you have to pay for has an ACTIVE component so you are best to steer clear of that. The passive scanner is simply fantastic and has, on rare occasions, picked up problems that Norton did not.

    With two reliable, well performing & independant AV installations, one ACTIVE, one PASSIVE, you will be covering all the angles.
    (edited)
  31. CRWAB's avatar
    jackdopson2007

    So many customers come in with Norton on their PC's, with Virus's in tow, … So many customers come in with Norton on their PC's, with Virus's in tow, claiming they've never had an issue with Norton and it's always worked, you go to scan their PC's because they run slowly, and what do you know... full... Pile of rubbish.


    What's funny is Norton isn't that bad anymore. You seem to have to pre-2008 sort of view where Norton was a slow-ass resource killer.

    These days it uses nothing, Idling at the moment on my machine using 0.1% CPU and 20mb RAM. Installs/Uninstalls in seconds too.
    It's not the best thing, but it doesn't matter what anti-virus/firewall you use if your a Muppet - which your cutomers most likely are!

    Personally I only use NIS over MSE for the following:
    - File shredding (without additional software)
    - More configurable firewall that works with my network setup
    It also has a far better "smart rating" too, which matters to some people - personally I just don't go clicking on **** like freesofwarepr0n.exe... Common sense is the best anti virus
  32. michbeat's avatar
    quote=DD98]Norton Internet Security 2013 / Norton 360 for download for £10/12. Use code NORTON60VK to get this price. Please don't vote cold because of free alternatives, for people who want to use Norton this is a good deal, only £3.33 per computer for a year.[/quote]

    Totally agree, I use Norton, and always look for a good deal
  33. campfreddie's avatar
    Good Deal, I too found a similar deal a few weeks ago but all the Norton haters voted it cold so people who do like Norton may have missed out, I'm sure these are the same people who hate Tesco, Apple, The Sun etc........................
  34. pauljones00's avatar
    Hot!
  35. Rach75's avatar
    it is still £10.00 in currys and with cloud aswell so cold from me
  36. deleted372319's avatar
    Doesn't windows 8 come with anti virus and firewall?
  37. deleted437479's avatar
    madnug

    its been a long time since I seen any av gets any hot vote here.



    Saturday morning. Lots of people who buy and fix their PCs at PC World must be on the forum.
  38. deleted242948's avatar
    Youngy

    Given that Microsoft Security Essentials failed certification again, I … Given that Microsoft Security Essentials failed certification again, I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole http://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-security-essentials-fails-av-test-certification-again



    Maybe you should only link articles you understand?

    Other anti-virus solutions use something called heuristics to literally discover malware based on how it behaves rather than based on a signature. This technique when done well is very effective, but also results in false-positive (i.e. "detecting" malware that isn't in fact malware at all).

    In the past such techniques have resulted in anti-virus software either detecting its self or worse detecting core parts of the operating system. So when the users got a pop-up and hit "quarantine" they were in some cases breaking their computer.

    Microsoft with MSE has decided to be conservative. Which is to say "let's be sure something is malware before we go after it!" Now you can argue if this is the kind of anti-virus you want on your PC or if you want something that uses heuristics heavily (e.g. MalwareBytes, Kaspersky).

    But claiming that people shouldn't be using MSE because it failed the 0-day test without explaining to people what the 0-day test is or how this impacts them is rather pathetic. At least explain it so people can make the choice themselves (i.e. "higher risk, but more effective AV" Vs. "lower risk, but less effective AV").
  39. anthony69's avatar
    Well, my son visits a lot of porn sites so naturally we need the best antivirus suite there is as this is where all the viruses are usually picked up apparently!.

    Anyway, Norton seems to do consistantly well, much better than MSE which Im using now, so this makes it a very attractive deal for me,

    Thanks OP!
's avatar