Also if you watch the Gillette ad carefully it very consciously uses white men more than men of colour in the examples they show of negative behaviour, then towards the end shows men of colour disproportionately more as examples of positive role models than white men on the ad. It’s so blatantly obvious how ‘Woke’’ it was trying to be. This is why it was widely ridiculed and then the consumer backlash started. As someone pointed out, if the Gillette ad was reversed to show women instead of men it would have immediately been labelled as misogynistic. It’s a textbook example of misandry and tribalism.
:D Great first post @deccyj Don't go making us wait another 10 years for your next one ;)
Thanks. Hot for me.
It had nothing to do with emotion, it basically accused all men of sexual harassment and ignorane. Angered a lot of people... imagine assuming only women are sexually harrased, then imagine assuming they are only harassed by men and then completely vilify all men and tar them with same brush. That's what Gillette did. Moronic thing to do they deserve the 350mil and counting it cost them.