Camera Lens Deals & Offers

OOS unforttunately.

Great price good find

Thanks, I ll stick to my adapted canon for now(still got a 5dc after all) and keep saving for the tamron 15-30...

OOS.

Both and will only use the central portion of the lens for ApS-c so sharp right across the frame.

No longer available.

Well, I'm very happy for you. I ordered mine on the 21st, still saying... Order status: Received. It was on 3 in stock before and after I ordered two, so I suspect they'll be cancelling my order. Fingers crossed not.

Hmm, that's odd. I got fairly instant confirmation when I ordered mine and received it within a few days.

This should be expired. I ordered two on Saturday night and they still haven't confirmed my order. I doubt they will tbh. Showing as unavailable now.

Taken by mistake a lot of them...

The point is that people need to be aware of who the are buying from and the risks. Many of the regulars on HUKD will be very familiar with eglobal but a lot of others will not. In essence, if everything goes to plan, you will receive the product described at a great price. However, if the product is damaged or broken, returns are at your cost and there are many reviews indicating that it can be difficult or impossible to get a replacement product or refund. If the product breaks during the normal warranty period, it is unlikely to be covered by the manufacturer. Having said this, with a lens, if it works on arrival, it is likely to keep working and so your main issue would be a doa product. For a lot of people, the discount available will justify them taking this risk. For others, they will prefer to buy second-hand through Amazon Warehouse or a local camera shop.

I have purchased a couple of lenses from eglobal and they have been fine

its not a ridiculous comment, many people would prefer 2nd hand over the risk from this very poorly rated overseas seller

Ridiculous comment, of course 2nd hand should be cheaper but that is not what the OP was listing.

I tried to buy on amazon warehouse - was more expensive but thought I would be safer, Amazon sent me a Canon Fit TWICE! I cast my net winder and this was as cheap as I could find for brand new

Sigma art are the best lenses out there. This 50mm lens is much sharper than the Nikon 50mm 1.4g. I wish the 85mm ones were the same price as this. I used his 35mm and 85mm art lens on my d600 I purchased recently and photos were superb.

expired https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/offer-listing/B00ICJWP6S/ref=dp_olp_new?ie=UTF8&condition=new

Never read that ,I know when reviewed by the Nikon magazine it scored best on test and highly recommended I’ve not had any problems with mine

Just bought the 150 -600 sport and this is also superb quality these lenses unlike most Nikon and others are made in Japan not Korea or Taiwan that should tell you something about quality

And sigma is still a 3rd party lens so can have some minor compatibility issue even though they have improved over the years

The 75-300 is a very average lens, without IS it will be usable only in bright light conditions. The 50mm/1.8 and 10-18mm are good image quality lenses and IMO more useful and helpful for a starter to develop his skills. Shame that have to pay on the Argos deal for the useless dock station.

Thanks JimmyLo & Bendown. Think I will go for the Curries option since it should give me the best of both worlds with near and far lenses, dont need the share station as will connect via wifi Cheersn 8)

The 50mm fixed lens should give you better quality images as there is less glass between the sensor and the image than the 18-55 lens at 50. The 50mm is also a faster lens so better in low light conditions and better at separating the foreground by blurring the background, useful for portraits and cinematic videos.

But you get the 50mm at f1.8 rather than approx f5.6 on the 18-55mm kit lens which will make a massive difference to the photos you take

But surely you have 50mm with the 18-55 zoom?

Would this be ideal for someone just starting out, not sure if photography is for them, just wanting to get their feet wet? From some of these comments selling the station & 10-18mm lens would make it around £200, could perhaps then get a cheaper lens to play around with as well as the other one that comes with it, 18-55mm

Check for best camera prises in https://www.eglobalcentraluk.com Delivery fast, no duty and customer service ok . My self i saved at least £500 in last two years. as i like new technologies and i change my camera twice already . If any one know cheaper place than eglobal pls write in a coments . Thank u

(embarrassed) I haven't played around with those settings. Lol. I was going to swap lenses on the d600 too. But as you say if i do learn the stops I can do it all with one lens. I hear some people just use the 35mm or the 85mm lens on their Nikon cameras

Yes. I put dial on P. Worked for me most of the time. Always required me to put the flash on though to stop pics being blurry. On the Nikon d600 I can take pics without the flash and still get great results. I have the 50mm 1.8 now but ordered the 1.4 so I can use use in even lower light condition and still get great results

Thanks ElGofre. That information is very useful

You missed out the part where an SLR can't even do video autofocusing properly. At least an iPhone can do that. This Canon can't. You need a special lens which you have to buy separately for this canon to do silent video autofocusing and I'm not even sure buying that lens is enough for this canon to accomplish that task properly. The bulk is also a major problem. Go for mirrorless instead. Same quality but less bulk and can do video autofocus properly.

I did think the question a troll comment too, there's not much trust to be had on the internet nowadays, that said it's actually not a bad question as it gives a chance to explain what SLR is all about, especially to those who enjoy photography on their phone and want to step it up. As well as those things mentioned, like sensor size differences, another massive difference is the ability to change lens. It's not uncommon to buy a lens which costs more than the camera itself; put a bad lens on an awesome camera, you'll get a bad photo. That piece of glass is vital, the camera is fed by light so it's only as good as the thing that catches the light for it. With an SLR you can buy a lens that is perfectly designed for a certain function, be it landscape shots, portrait, or macro close up shots. Not something an iPhone could ever offer. Control. SLRs are designed around control of the light that enters the camera, it's through this control that people are able to take amazing night photos of the stars, or those beautiful portrait shots. Shutter speed, aperture and ISO are the three main players, they all alter how light behaves when it enters the camera and hits that sensor. Those who buy an SLR and leave it in Auto have really bought the wrong kit. Don't get me wrong, they'll still see an improvement in the quality of the photo, but not enough to justify the cost and switch, in my opinion, a real waste of a great tool. You must put a little effort in to learn how to use said tool, that dial with A, S, M etc. on it is there for a reason. Snobbery. If you're a good photographer, an IPhone X and other cam phones like it, can still take a great picture. Composition, timing and other factors can still result in some cracking shots that will stand the test of time, some SLR snobs might argue otherwise. However, the exact same shot in the hands of someone who knows how to use an SLR will look that much more awesome. Combine the large sensor, with the changeable lens and the control you get on SLRs, you should start to see what's different about them and an iPhone X.

Purchased one. Box wasn't factory sealed. Looked a decent basic camera for the price.

I wasn’t trying to compare them, just commenting on others who were. I have a mix of mainly STM and USM lenses for my Canon, never had an issue with lens noise when refocusing but I know the standard lenses have this issues from people I work with. The STM nifty fifty can’t be heard on mine when I do video and that’s the nearest equivalent spec of the Sony which is twice the price.

They are not really equivalent as the Sony kit lenses on their mirrorless cameras are silent during autofocusing. This is especially important for video. These cheap Canon lenses probably aren't silent in use so are useless for video autofocus. How much more do you have to pay for silent autofocus lenses on the Canon? I'm not sure this canon can even do decent video autofocusing even with the more expensive silent lenses attached.

Back in Stock

Same price and in stock here.. https://www.parkcameras.com/p/7240583N/sony-e-mount-lenses/sony/fe-50mm-f18-prime-lens?

Still £179 at Wilkinson Cameras, currently out of stock. https://www.wilkinson.co.uk/sony-fe-50mm-f-1-8-lens/

Patchy autofocus but excellent optically, well worth a buy if it pops up at this price again.

back up to £225

in the past

This deal is showing £449 can you please confirm where it is £399

This is showing as £449, where is it £399?

As good a camera as you'll ever need...

Not sure I am serious enough a photographer to put down £700 on a lens!

The Aldi one for £49.99 is so much better than this, I found this grossly underpowered, the Aldi one is 710W and kicks a$$.

Couldn't imagine cutting floorboards tongues with a chainsaw. Not saying it wouldn't be fun.

It's a bit like when ipads came out and people asked if they needed one if they have a netbook. No but they are handy.

I've got a corded saw and a cordless one..... Do I need this?

The CPS kept the ones of my DIY chainsaw job on the ex husband... ;)