Heathrow security staff to strike for 31 days between 24th June and 27th August

Posted 7th Jun 2023
Update 1
23/06 - Heathrow airport security staff have called off strikes after voting to accept a pay offer
Just seen on various news sites, that Heathrow security staff to strike for 31 days between 24th June and 27th August over pay. The action will affect Terminals 3 and 5 as well as campus security. Possibly may impact queues at Heathrow, so if the strikes go ahead and travelling in that period may need to allow more time at the airport just in case.

The strike dates are:


  • 24, 25, June
  • 28, 29 and 30 June
  • 14, 15, 16, July
  • 21, 22, 23, 24, July
  • 28, 29, 30, 31 July
  • 4, 5, 6 , 7 August
  • 11, 12, 13, 14, August
  • 18, 19, 20 August
  • 24, 25, 26, 27 August.

Source: BBC News



4146845-3pgC3.jpg

Related discussions / useful links







Community Updates
New Comment

221 Comments

sorted by
's avatar
  1. Nanook's avatar
    Bear in mind, they were forced to take a minimum 15% paycut.

    While the ceo walked away with a £1+ million bonus. (edited)
  2. headfullofcrisps's avatar
    How on earth can they afford to strike that many days in such a small period of time…dear me, they must be losing more money than the pay rise would cover alone.
    plebbygiraffe's avatar
    You're correct. This is an odd one.

    The union's press release say they reject the 10.1% pay offer because it is below inflation. It isn't below inflation, but the union wants to use RPI, which they say is 11.4%.

    Seems like aggressive action for a 1.3% difference.

    In striking for so long they will lose 9% or 12% of their yearly pay - depending on how their pay is calculated.

    It'll take 7-9 years to recover that lost pay if they get their 1.3% additional amount.

    Can't imagine many stick out that job for that long. And that's ignoring any prior strike action this year, or subsequent action.
  3. spencerslide's avatar
    I have zero sympathy for them, they are the rudest, arrogant people in the industry.

    When I was last at T5 I left my smartwatch in the tray, I took about 10 steps, turned back to get it and it was gone, I turned the tracker on to look for it and it was, according to the staff, walking away through the doors marked "private" all on its own.

    I called everyone you could think to complain and heard nothing.....they literally stole my watch and they all knew.

    When I started to get angry and annoyed with them they called security who threatened to actually detain me for claiming someone had stolen my watch. I actually saw my watch it in the tray, I turned away from it for about 15 seconds.

    The looks I was receiving told me it looked like a scam and they were all in on it.
  4. Bier's avatar
    Disappointing reporting from the BBC when they only talk about percentages, not the actual numbers of what they're paid.

    Here's the Unions announcement
    . They don't mention actual pay either but claim
    Heathrow security officers are paid less than workers at other major airports in London and the South East. The officers, who were the highest paid prior to the Covid pandemic, are now paid between £5,000 and £6,000 per annum less than their counterparts at Stansted and Gatwick.
    DuckDuck86's avatar
    So they are fine being unfairly paid more but not less, an obvious point.
  5. Admast79's avatar
    Hmm refuse 10% pay rise?

    A lot of people that I know, would love to have that high pay rise.

    On one hand, I got it, everyone would like to earn more, but as it was already said - if you don't like your pay and you refuse 10% pay rise, then maybe you should change your job?

    I wonder, why they can't post what is the average pay there? I can bet a lot of people would be quite surprised.
  6. AverageBloke's avatar
    All strikers should be sacked, enough is enough. They simply don't give a damn about their customers.

    It'll be chaos. More time is spent in queues than flying short/medium haul as it is. I'm glad that I never have to fly again! (edited)
    watzeee's avatar
    Customers are those being provided a service the company provides, so why are you not mad at the company that have failed to negotiate a suitable pay rise for their workers?
  7. Goldstink's avatar
    I'm with HOTPOT.

    If you dont like your job conditions get off your lazy ass and go and find a better one.
    No one is forcing them to work there.

    Im with HOTPOT.

    If you dont like your job look for a better one.
    The job pays what it pays. if not enough you are in the wrong job. (edited)
    dinglebert's avatar
    So when you have no nurses left will you still be saying the same? Half at the moment of all new nurses have come from abroad depriving those countries of trained staff. As the numbers of UK nurses move to better paid jobs abroad we will be in the same situation.
  8. martin's avatar
    Does this mean we'll be able to walk through customs with a suitcase full of amber 🌿
  9. shALKE's avatar
    Nobody is mentioning that HAL staff took over 15% of a "temporary" pay cut through Covid that hasn't been given back to them, and that it seems Heathrow is trying to forget.
  10. jinkssick's avatar
    Was involved in this when they stricked at the end of March 2023. I was dreading it but I have never gone through security quicker. They seemed to have every manager/supervisor from accross the UK manning security.
  11. Goldstink's avatar
    Sack them all and bar them from travel themselves.
    KingKay69's avatar
    Or give them the proper pay rise as they suffered 15-20% pay cut in 2020 due to Covid and as now Covid is no more and travelling and passenger numbers are back to what it was before COVID, the pay should not only be back to what it was pre COVID but precovid + inflation
  12. Jonb133's avatar
    Some horrible selfish people on here, people only strike as a last resort.
    Bazallworks's avatar
    Genuinely makes me ashamed to be British
  13. SpeedbirdB777's avatar
    Queues will probably be shorter. The Army seemed more efficient last time!
    bbd99's avatar
    That was passport control? And when you say ‘efficient’…. It was admitted the main reason for that was because they did not know what to do and waved everyone through. Good time to get in to country (edited)
  14. Spacehduk's avatar
    A few people on here saying they're on minimum wage.
    Best info I can find is glassdoor, where the salary is probably weighted towards quite outdated salaries and also weighted towards younger, less experienced and lower paid staff. The figure there is just under £14ph with some staff earning over £50k. Not bad for a zero skill job.
    E_T_C's avatar
    A friend of mine applied for the role and confirmed it was £14 per hour but this were 5am -3pm and 3pm-11pm or overnight shifts. This was on a rolling 4 day on 2 day off rota with no extra payment for early/late shifts, weekends or Bank holidays and it was 32 hours a week on average so you would earn £23,296.

    The coffee shops and other retail outlets in the Airport pay a higher salary and the hours are better with less stress.

    They are not paid anywhere close to £50k sadly (edited)
  15. unbearableArt's avatar
    Good for them. Hope they will get the pay rise they deserve. Everyone who is working in contact with UK public should be paid double.
    Bazallworks's avatar
    I think half the reason so many places don't have a phone line any more is because of how rude and ungrateful the average customer has become.
  16. AncientYouth's avatar
    10% of not a lot is not a lot
  17. grant.pearce's avatar
    [deleted]
    shwanko2's avatar
    exactly .. if they are not happy with the pay... then pls leave so who pay you more...don't make other people' life miserable bcz of ur greed .. last week was miserable to me .. took me 4h extra from my day to go to work !!
  18. shwanko2's avatar
    This is literally taking people as hostages till firms pay ur demands and a ransom so things go normal.
    They care less about misery they put others into who work hard all year and deny them a peaceful trip they deserve.
    I have zero sympathy for those people taking those strikes.. ZERO.. is Utter greed at expense of us.
    Bazallworks's avatar
    yes, let the elites continue to make us infight instead of realising who the real enemies of progress are!
  19. hotdog's avatar
    Shame they couldn't have had a strike in mid-winter, probably would have had more public sympathy...
    Bazallworks's avatar
    the whole point of a strike is to cause disruption so they can remind us how impartant a role they play in society
  20. Fastpotato's avatar
    Meanwhile us nurses were ruled against by the high courts, and only allowed to strike for 48 hours lol
    XP200's avatar
    Our NHS and its staff are this countries pride and joy, and always will be.
  21. pagehamillton's avatar
    Absolute joke . Train strike prob too , and my whole holiday is gone . Thanks . Thanks a lot .
    Bazallworks's avatar
    You are moaning at the wrong people.
  22. Felipe.Lopes's avatar
    This country is going downhill... And the problem is that Europe/US is doing the same.
    QueenBetty's avatar
    The priorities are just messed up
  23. mr_trumpet's avatar
    The demons in Davos will be very happy
  24. Ghostrecon's avatar
    failed state
  25. FAMILYGUY's avatar
    We are like a 3rd world country at times.
    Bazallworks's avatar
    and why do you say that?
  26. horace's avatar
    This thread has polarised opinion (as all similar threads seem to do). I find some of the views expressed here deeply frustrating, so I'll take this opportunity to make a general plea (slightly off topic, but this seems a good place to put it).

    Having had the pleasure of working with the great British public for many years now, I'd ask you all to spare a thought for everyone in the travel industry who is in a customer-facing role (heck, let's include everyone, not just the travel industry). Don't get me wrong, there are some lovely people out there, and they are still the majority, but there are also a significant number of angry, entitled (and often intoxicated) bellends who pitch up at the airport spoiling for conflict. Why are the queues so long? Because not so long ago, a lot of people died due to complacency about security, and because we don't want our customers to be blown to bits by lunatics (sorry). Furthermore, the government has a responsibility to control our borders, which means checks. You can't have it both ways. E-gates do speed things up, but if you travel by air, you will have to queue (again, sorry).

    Some of the things I see regularly: people arriving for their outbound holiday flight so blind drunk that they can't negotiate the steps up to the aircraft. They are then gobsmacked when their airline refuses to carry them, often leading to the police being called (and arrests being made). Then there are the ones who think they are entitled to insult and belittle the staff who are there to help them. Believe me, it isn't easy to keep your cool when faced with a screaming eejit with no interest in listening to a word you are saying (even if you are trying your level best to be helpful - and we do try). We all have our stock responses for these situations - my personal favourite is 'I'm sorry, but my obligation to provide you with a service ended when you saw fit to call me a c***.' We are all used to it, but it's challenging work, and much harder than some people think. I've never actually punched anyone, but my dreams are peppered with acts of violence...

    Going on holiday can be really stressful, I know. We get it - it's part of our job to get it. All I can say is that if you treat those around you with a bit of basic consideration and respect, you will be doing your part. Aside from that, it is (in my experience) the nice people who get the best service. Always. Nobody's going the extra mile for an ungrateful tool. If five pints of Stella turns you into a knobend, why not try stopping at two? (at least until you reach your destination, at which point you take your chances with local law enforcement).

    And finally (back on topic), for the benefit of those who struggle to see the point in airport security (or see it as a non-job), I say this: Lockerbie, the twin towers and a number of other terrible occasions when hundreds of holidaymakers died screaming as the plane they were travelling in plunged to the ground like a dart. Air travel has never been safer than it is now, largely due to huge increases in airport security

    Suck it up and queue, because it's a small price to pay.

    And maybe show a bit of empathy for the people whose job it is to make it more difficult for terrorists to end you. They deserve fair pay and conditions, as do you.

    Was that all a bit too much? Sorry.
    thecatmeowth's avatar
    My main frustration is that it's always never the people in charge though who it affects but just the passenger. It's like the price of everyday stuff increases and the bosses typically say it's to pay for salary increases yet somehow in a lot of the typical businesses a significant proportion seems to be kept for shareholders and bosses rather than the actual staff who get peanuts out of the increase. A typical example would be in food staff only received a 9 percent salary increase Vs the 20 percent that prices have gone up by and even though energy prices have stabilised the price of food items still rides. It would be good if everyone could get their fair increase but trouble is that alot of firms are too greedy and there are little to no unions for organised strikes as a example.
  27. boonspoon's avatar
    I'm travelling down to London by train on the 30th June. I really hope the trains don't decide to strike on the same days too.
    Chanchi32's avatar
    Author
    Hopefully not
  28. cityhunter123uk's avatar
    Just send the army over
    harrythefish's avatar
    Erm... have you heard about who's going on strike next?
  29. SparklingFruits's avatar
    Good on em, more people striking the better.
  30. themachman's avatar
    Good on them
  31. Tanuki334's avatar
    Strikes dont work bc rich ppl / decision-makers fly private
    SpeedbirdB777's avatar
    Simply not true.
  32. evadnefelosial's avatar
    Will show up early for our trip. Hope it amounts to them actually getting something decent this time.
  33. reubenno's avatar
    Can't be that bad off if they can strike for 31 days.

    Though in saying that I'm for the strike, workers have had awful wage stagnation in this joke of a country for decades. (edited)
    watzeee's avatar
    Usually the union will have funds available during strikes to help with this e.g. £70 a day
  34. persaudp's avatar
    Thanks for sharing this!
  35. T1MSK1's avatar
    Last time they striked management and army back up meant queues were smaller, and cleared faster.
    Jonb133's avatar
    By letting everyone through without checks.
  36. backllem's avatar
    Nobody would care if we went on strike. Sadder.
  37. thecatmeowth's avatar
    Hopefully those people striking will not be striking in September fingers crossed. At this rate will just be stuck in back garden with all the different strikes occurring.
  38. Scrappy's avatar
    Cheers for the head's up . Returning on the 22nd July via T3 so need to rearrange travel. Hoping the e-passport will be up and running.
's avatar
Discussions
Top Merchants